President Donald Trump has tentatively agreed to limits on his profitable crypto activities, but Senate Democrats believe the Clarity Act's measures are insufficient.
By Jesse Hamilton|Edited by Nikhilesh DeUpdated Jul 24, 2026, 3:05 p.m. Published Jul 24, 2026, 3:01 p.m. 5 min readMake preferred on ShareShare this articleCopy linkX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmailMake preferred on SummaryShow- As time progresses, the passage of the crypto Clarity Act in 2026 appears increasingly challenging, with the provision regarding personal crypto limits for senior officials remaining a focal point of contention.
- The ethics clause, which surfaced for the first time in a final draft of the Clarity Act this week, introduces an unprecedented limitation on a sitting president, but Democrats express strong opposition to its enforcement and temporary nature.
Democratic senators involved in negotiating the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act sought to impose unique restrictions on President Donald Trump's crypto business interests. Trump’s unexpected agreement to certain limitations surprised many, yet the Democrats have branded the resultant proposal as inadequate.
Despite its perceived weaknesses, the president's concessions signify a recognition that regulating his billion-dollar business ventures is a legitimate ethical consideration. Both Republicans and the White House are taken aback by the rejection of this concession.
"This is exactly what Democrats have requested," noted White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt in an interview with CoinDesk. He emphasized that Trump agreed to adhere to conduct restrictions, a precedent not set by any previous president, while Democrats are now pushing for enhanced enforcement against Trump.
"Unfortunately, you cannot achieve two significant victories with a single effort," Witt remarked during his discussion with CoinDesk TV.
The negotiations surrounding the conflict-of-interest provisions have stalled the Clarity Act’s progress for months, possibly pushing it beyond the optimal legislative window in 2026. The latest release of the draft included the first ethics provisions, prompting a critical response from many Democrats.
Senator Elizabeth Warren from Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee, criticized the bill, stating, “Donald Trump earned over $1.4 billion from cryptocurrency ventures, and this bill does nothing to stop him from accumulating even more crypto profits.” She suggested that Trump would likely disregard the proposed law.
The proposed language would impose a temporary ban on senior government officials, including the president, vice president, members of Congress, and federal judges, from issuing or sponsoring cryptocurrencies.
However, it does not account for previous activities, and there are numerous crypto business activities that do not fall under the categories of issuance or sponsorship. Therefore, Trump may not need to divest from significant investments, such as his stake in World Liberty Financial, although he might need to establish legal barriers, like placing certain investments in trusts.
Negotiators who previously debated the inclusion of such an ethics section are now concentrating on who would be responsible for enforcing these rules. The responsibility would lie with federal law enforcement, specifically the U.S. Department of Justice, which would be limited to penalties of up to $500,000 and could not initiate criminal proceedings. Democrats argue that state attorneys general should also have the authority to enforce these rules without interference from Trump's administration.
Another significant limitation is that the restrictions will expire at the start of 2029, meaning any future Department of Justice under a potentially Democratic administration would be unable to pursue actions regarding conduct prior to its tenure. Thus, Trump could only be pursued by his own DOJ, which he has nominated a former personal attorney to lead.
Democrats express skepticism that a loyalist to Trump would enforce these rules vigorously, given the president's history of dismissing and targeting those who have investigated him.
According to Beacon Policy Advisors, "This is a non-starter for Democrats, who are advocating for state attorneys general to have enforcement authority, and we expect this to be a primary focus in upcoming negotiations."
Despite this, some top crypto lobbyists are privately voicing concerns that Democrats are not being pragmatic. They argue that if lawmakers expected Trump to face severe consequences for his substantial crypto earnings last year, that was unrealistic. The most they might achieve is this formal and unconventional ethics rule regarding the president's business interests.
Lobbyists maintain that regardless of the flaws in the Clarity Act, failing to pass it would leave the U.S. without any tailored enforcement mechanisms, consumer protections, regulatory clarity, or ethical standards for government officials.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune expressed doubts on Thursday regarding the likelihood of the Clarity Act passing before the summer recess, indicating that missing this deadline could significantly hinder the legislation's chances in 2026.
Leaders from three major U.S. advocacy organizations — the Crypto Council for Innovation, the Digital Chamber, and the Blockchain Association — sent a letter to Senate leadership on Friday urging them to prioritize the bill's consideration to advance this bipartisan legislative effort. Witt from the White House countered Thune's remarks, asserting there remains a viable path for action in early August, just before the Senate's break.
However, Thune also mentioned that the Senate needs to assess "where the votes are" on the Clarity Act, as the ethics section and several other components are still highly contentious, and the bill is not yet assured of the 60 votes required for passage.
Democratic senators like Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland, one of the two Democrats who voted for the bill in committee, have stated that the legislation "falls short" and requires enhancements, while Republican Senator Bernie Moreno has insisted that Democrats' criticisms should be disregarded in light of the "most powerful ethics language in US history."
The other Democrat who supported the Clarity Act in committee and played a key role in negotiating the restrictions has reportedly used more colorful language to describe the draft's shortcomings.
Some Republicans, including Senator Thom Tillis, have also raised concerns about the current language of the bill.
Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis, another key figure in the discussions, emphasized in a Friday social media post that "instead of doing the bare minimum, President Trump willingly accepted stricter measures, meaningful enforcement, and enhanced transparency than the law required. That’s leadership that sets a higher standard."
She also mentioned in an interview with CoinDesk that the ethics provision would additionally prohibit crypto platforms from listing assets that conflict with the restrictions. This aspect is still under review by crypto insiders. Witt remarked to CoinDesk, "This is a historic provision, and it deserves recognition. It's time to set aside politics and advance this bill."
White HouseClarity ActExclusiveLatest Crypto News- 1Sam Altman-backed World Network secures $52.5 million in fresh funding to fight online AI deepfakes1 hour ago
- 2Institutional crypto trading platform LMAX is exploring sale, IPO1 hour ago
- 3Saylor and team overhaul Strategy's bitcoin metrics as bear market persists2 hours ago
- 4Brazilian farmers tokenized dairy cows to get loans, bypassing bank lending limits2 hours ago
- 5EU hits Russia with massive 21st sanctions package targeting $120B crypto network4 hours ago
- 6Crypto market maker B2C2 held sale talks with multiple potential buyers4 hours ago
- 7Crypto's institutional influx has killed the memecoin craze4 hours ago
- 8A $5 billion cluster has formed in bitcoin options. It tells a bullish story4 hours ago
- 9Bitcoin settles near $65,000 as oil's march toward $100 fails to spook the market4 hours ago
- 10Poolin was bitcoin's biggest mining pool and now it's filing for bankruptcy4 hours ago
Crypto Flows, Share and the Selective Rotation
Crypto Flows, Share and the Selective Rotation
Markets repositioned since June, but Binance held share (~55% user funds, ~24% spot) and drew net inflows in early July while the tracked market saw outflows.
By CoinDesk ResearchJul 22, 2026Markets repositioned since June, but Binance held share (~55% user funds, ~24% spot) and drew net inflows in early July while the tracked market saw outflows.
Why it matters:
Markets repositioned since June, but Binance held share (~55% user funds, ~24% spot) and drew net inflows in early July while the tracked market saw outflows.
View Full ReportMore From Policy