On September 28, the Illinois Department of Revenue (IDOR) released a draft of the regulations pertaining to the Digital Asset Tax Act. This document clarifies the tax implications for transactions involving stablecoins, decentralized finance (DeFi), transfers between personal accounts, and other digital asset dealings.

The law is set to take effect on January 1, 2027, applying to various transactions involving the exchange, transfer, and storage of digital assets for clients in Illinois. Digital brokers will primarily be responsible for collecting and remitting the tax.

The draft has not yet undergone the formal legislative process, as it has not been submitted to the state secretary or the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR). IDOR is accepting feedback until October 30.

The agency noted the novelty of the tax and the complexities of the digital asset industry as reasons for the preliminary publication. Regulators have encouraged market participants to identify any overlooked scenarios or provisions that may require further clarification.

When the Tax is Applicable

The Digital Asset Tax Act was passed in June. The draft regulations establish four primary conditions for tax applicability:

  • The client must be located in Illinois;
  • The client must receive a service related to digital asset activities;
  • The transaction must be conducted by a digital asset broker for a fee;
  • The taxable activity must be recorded on the blockchain.

The tax rate is set at 0.2% of the value of the digital asset being exchanged, transferred, or stored, with the value determined in dollars at the time of the transaction's completion.

Brokers may use their own spot price for valuation, or, in its absence, refer to a benchmark from a regulated market data provider. Thus, the tax base is linked to the asset's value rather than the broker's commission or the client's profit.

For instance, on a taxable cryptocurrency transfer valued at $10,000, the tax would amount to $20, regardless of the broker's commission.

The definition of a transfer is broad, meaning that a transaction could be taxable even if it involves moving an asset between two accounts of the same client, provided it is executed by a broker for a fee and is recorded on the blockchain. Conversely, if a bank merely updates an internal record of ownership between client accounts without a corresponding blockchain transaction, no tax would apply.

The law mandates separate accounting for exchanges, transfers, and storage. However, the draft regulations clarify that if an exchange or transfer and storage occur in a single transaction for one fee and are accompanied by one blockchain movement, IDOR suggests treating them as one taxable event.

For remote transactions, a client's location may be determined through their home or mailing address, IP address, and other details regarding the primary location of service usage.

Starting January 1, eligible digital brokers will also need to register in Illinois. They must file tax returns and remit collected taxes monthly by the 20th of the following month.

IDOR Clarifies Rules for DeFi and Stablecoins

The draft explicitly categorizes stablecoins as digital assets. Transactions involving stablecoins may be subject to taxation if the other stipulated conditions are met. For DeFi and decentralized exchanges, a key factor will be the presence of a fee for the intermediary.

Standard peer-to-peer transfers without broker involvement and compensation are not taxable. Fees directed towards mining, staking, and blockchain validation are also not considered as such compensation. The draft excludes NFTs from the definition of digital assets for tax purposes.

At least two separate lawsuits have been filed against the Digital Asset Tax Act. On July 21, the industry group Digital Chamber filed a lawsuit in Sangamon County seeking to halt the law's implementation.

On August 21, the Crypto Council for Innovation and the Blockchain Association filed a separate complaint. These organizations argue that the tax violates the U.S. and Illinois Constitutions, the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act, and the principles of due process.

On September 9, the plaintiffs requested a preliminary injunction to block the law's enforcement until the case is resolved. As of the time of this writing, the court has not annulled or suspended the law's implementation.

It's worth noting that updated IRS transparency rules in February raised concerns among U.S. crypto investors, as the tax provisions required exchanges to disclose client information.

Follow ForkLog on social media

Telegram (main channel) Facebook X