You’re reading Crypto for Advisors, CoinDesk’s weekly newsletter that unpacks digital assets for financial advisors. Subscribe here to receive it every Thursday.
Happy Thursday, advisors!
In this week’s edition, Dovile Silenskyte from WisdomTree discusses the two key questions investors often consider when investing in bitcoin.
Additionally, in the “Ask an Expert” section, Bryan Courchesne from DAiM addresses how the recent failure of the CLARITY Act vote could affect bitcoin’s investment outlook.
Enjoy the read!
Owning Bitcoin Shouldn't Feel Like a Second Job
As bitcoin increasingly finds its place in investment portfolios, managing direct ownership can often feel like taking on an additional job, requiring significant time, technical knowledge, and operational diligence.
Investors may have a clear understanding of bitcoin’s potential within their portfolios but may not wish to take on the responsibilities of being their own custodians, cybersecurity teams, and protocol analysts.
Self-custody does not eliminate risk; it merely shifts it
The phrase “Not your keys, not your coins” is well-known, yet it doesn’t tell the whole story.
When investors choose self-custody, they must protect private keys and recovery phrases, ensure their wallet software or hardware is maintained, execute transactions accurately, and prepare for issues like inheritance or incapacity. Unlike traditional banking, there’s no customer service for lost recovery phrases or mistaken transactions.
While having control can be beneficial, it also transfers custody risk from an institution to the individual.
Although hardware wallets can mitigate some risks, they do not guarantee foolproof security. Other factors, such as backup phrases, personal information, software updates, and transaction management, also play a critical role in operational security.
For investors making a modest investment in bitcoin, these operational responsibilities can feel overwhelming, as they do not enhance the potential returns of bitcoin but are simply the costs associated with direct ownership.
Bitcoin is dynamic
While bitcoin is designed to resist arbitrary changes, it continues to evolve. Software updates, wallet compatibility problems, and occasional chain splits can complicate decisions for those who hold it directly.
Chain splits can be particularly challenging, potentially creating rights to assets on competing networks, forcing holders to decide whether to claim, hold, sell, or disregard them. Factors such as security, liquidity, wallet compatibility, transaction replay risk, and tax implications can all be significant.
This is where the idealized vision of self-custody meets the practical challenges of managing it. Direct bitcoin ownership means not only possessing the asset but also managing the operational implications of its ecosystem.
Understanding exposure versus ownership
It is essential for investors to differentiate between two often conflated questions:
- Do I want exposure to bitcoin?
- Do I want to manage bitcoin directly?
These are distinct considerations.
A professionally managed exchange-traded product can offer exposure to the bitcoin market while outsourcing custody, key management, and handling protocol events to experts. Investors still face bitcoin’s price volatility, which remains unchanged regardless of the wrapper, but they can avoid the operational complexities associated with direct ownership.
Advisors should focus on determining whether a 1%, 3%, or another allocation aligns with their client's investment goals, rather than establishing a crypto-security operation around that allocation.
However, not all bitcoin investment vehicles are created equal. Investors and their advisors must evaluate the structure, custody arrangements, fees, and especially how forks and other protocol events are handled. Clear documentation should specify who makes these decisions and how any resulting benefits are managed.
Bitcoin can serve as an investment without necessitating it become an operational hobby.
- Dovile Silenskyte, director of digital assets research, WisdomTree
Ask an Expert
Q: How does the failure of the CLARITY Act affect your long-term outlook for bitcoin?
A: I don’t believe the failure of the CLARITY Act fundamentally alters the long-term investment rationale for bitcoin. Bitcoin’s value proposition does not hinge on the passage of a U.S. market-structure bill. What changes is the regulatory landscape for the wider digital-asset sector.
The bill would have clarified which assets and activities fall under the SEC or the CFTC, potentially speeding up institutional engagement and product innovation. Its failure leaves that ambiguity intact. However, bitcoin already benefits from a robust institutional framework, including regulated futures, spot ETFs, and established custody solutions.
For bitcoin investors, I see this more as a delay in regulatory clarity rather than a shift in the fundamental investment thesis.
Q: Is the failure of the CLARITY Act more critical for bitcoin or the broader cryptocurrency market?
A: I believe it holds more significance for the broader crypto market than for bitcoin itself. Bitcoin already possesses a relatively advanced institutional framework, including spot ETFs and regulated futures. The CLARITY Act would have had a more substantial impact on establishing regulations for many other digital assets and businesses that still function in a less defined regulatory environment.
This distinction is important for investors. While "crypto" is frequently viewed as a single asset class, the regulatory and investment dynamics of bitcoin can differ significantly from those of other tokens and crypto enterprises. The failure of the CLARITY Act introduces another period of uncertainty for the wider industry, but it does not fundamentally alter the long-term investment thesis for bitcoin.
Q: How should investors react to the CLARITY Act's failure?
A: I wouldn’t base portfolio decisions solely on the outcome of a single legislative vote. For bitcoin investors, more critical factors include time horizon, liquidity requirements, portfolio concentration, and the investor's risk tolerance regarding volatility.
The failure of the CLARITY Act provides useful information, but it should not replace a solid investment strategy. It highlights the importance of distinguishing between bitcoin's relatively mature market structure and the broader universe of digital assets.
From a wealth management perspective, we focus less on predicting individual legislative outcomes and more on ensuring that our clients' bitcoin exposure aligns with their overall financial goals.
Keep Reading
- The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has granted a blanket five-year exemption for the listing and trading of tokenized securities without the need to register as an exchange.
- Job listings from tech giants such as Google and Apple are seeking expertise in stablecoins and tokenization.
- The social media platform X has enabled crypto trading for its users.
For the latest crypto news and market updates, visit coindesk.com and coindesk.com/institutions.
IMPORTANT INFORMATIONThis material is prepared by WisdomTree and its affiliates and is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and does not constitute a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of the date of production and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this material are derived from proprietary and non-proprietary sources. Therefore, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given, and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by WisdomTree, nor any affiliate, nor any of their officers, employees or agents. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.Crypto for AdvisorsLatest Crypto News- 1Crypto casino Duelbits shuts down following $7 million hot wallet hack13 minutes ago
- 2Bitcoin's bear markets are softening; bull markets could be on the horizon34 minutes ago
- 3UK’s top banks conduct the world’s first interbank transactions using tokenized deposits 54 minutes ago
- 4European stablecoin issuer Qivalis anticipates a transformation in global trade finance1 hour ago
- 5Cathie Wood's ARK collaborates with Securitize to tokenize a venture fund with OpenAI and Anthropic stakes3 hours ago
- 6Solana Foundation recruits Binance and Polygon veterans to enhance its tokenized finance initiatives3 hours ago
- 7Crypto investment firm RockawayX bets $150 million on yield becoming the next major use case3 hours ago
- 8EU's financial regulator plans to prioritize AI and tokenization in 20273 hours ago
- 9Brooklyn man sentenced to 12 years for stealing $16 million in a Coinbase phishing scam4 hours ago
- 10Litecoin token surges as network activity increases4 hours ago
The Definitive Stablecoin Landscape Series: Asia Pacific
The Definitive Stablecoin Landscape Series: Asia Pacific
As stablecoins enter regulated finance, the Asia-Pacific region is emerging as a critical testing ground. This report outlines the region’s regulations, use cases, and the role of RLUSD.
By CoinDesk ResearchSep 15, 2026Commissioned byRippleAs stablecoins transition into regulated finance, the Asia-Pacific region is becoming a key proving ground. This report details the region’s regulations, applications, and the role of RLUSD.
Why it matters:
As stablecoins are integrated into regulated finance, the APAC region is becoming a crucial testing ground. This report maps the region’s rules, use cases, and RLUSD’s position.
View Full ReportMore From CoinDesk Indices