Delay of Clarity Act: A Potential Silver Lining for Crypto

The Senate's decision to delay a vote on the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act has stirred frustration in the crypto industry, but it may offer a chance to resolve key issues.

PolicyDelay of Clarity Act: A Potential Silver Lining for Crypto

The crypto sector is expressing frustration and disappointment over the Senate's decision to forgo a procedural vote on the Clarity Act this month, although this may not be the worst scenario.

By Nikhilesh De|Edited by Stephen Alpher30 min ago5 min readMake preferred on ShareShare this articleCopy linkX (Twitter)LinkedIn Facebook Email Make preferred on U.S. Capitol Building (Jesse Hamilton/CoinDesk)

Senate Majority Leader John announced last Thursday that the Senate would not proceed with a procedural vote regarding the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act before the August recess, reducing the likelihood of the bill being enacted this year. However, the probability of a successful vote was already low, and this postponement may provide lawmakers with additional time to resolve existing concerns.

You’re reading State of Crypto, a CoinDesk newsletter exploring the intersection of cryptocurrency and governmental policy. Click here to subscribe for future editions.

Deferred Decisions

The Narrative

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act will not advance through any Senate procedural votes this August. It remains uncertain whether it will gain traction when lawmakers reconvene in mid-September. Nevertheless, it seems evident that if a vote had occurred, the bill would not have made significant headway.

Significance

While the crypto industry was eager for a vote on the Clarity Act, a successful outcome would likely have been more beneficial. Had the bill failed a cloture vote last week, it might have stalled the process until the next Congress. Moreover, it is questionable if the Senate would have voted to move Clarity forward before the August break, especially in light of ongoing concerns regarding President Donald Trump's connections to the crypto sector, renewed discussions about stablecoin yields, and other unresolved issues.

Breaking It Down

The crypto industry's attempt to push for a vote on the Clarity Act this month has revealed numerous complexities. Legislative aides and industry insiders have pointed out that the multitude of unresolved matters presented a significant barrier to even a successful procedural vote, making it increasingly apparent throughout the week that holding that vote would be challenging.

One of the primary concerns, as reported by CoinDesk and other outlets for months, is ethical considerations. President Donald Trump's business connections to crypto have raised alarms among Democrats for over a year, with lawmakers voicing worries dating back to May 2025 during discussions on the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act). Trump's reported $1.4 billion profit has concretized these worries, with a source describing it as the "kill shot" for negotiations on Friday.

Additional concerns remain, including ongoing debates over law enforcement provisions, unresolved agricultural issues, and a rising number of lawmakers expressing worries about stablecoin yields and rewards.

These factors suggest that if a vote had taken place, it likely would have failed. The GENIUS Act faced a similar struggle before ultimately passing the Senate, indicating that a failed motion to proceed or an initial cloture vote would not necessarily mark the end for Clarity. However, the timing—just three months before elections and right before a lengthy recess—would have severely impacted the bill's prospects for success.

Current prospects depend on whom you consult. Senator Angela Alsobrook stated to CoinDesk that the objective remains to pass the bill. "We've worked for over a year on a bipartisan basis to protect consumers, limit deposit flight, fight illicit finance and include a fair deal on ethics," she said. "We will continue our work — getting Clarity Act right remains our goal."

Senator Cynthia Lummis echoed this sentiment in a public statement, asserting, "we've come too far to quit now." She added, "I will not give up because I believe to my core that this industry deserves to thrive with clear rules of the road on U.S. soil, that consumers deserve to be protected from scams and have the confidence to participate in our digital economy, and that law enforcement deserves the tools they need to hold bad actors accountable."

However, opinions within the industry are divided regarding the bill's chances of passing. One individual closely monitoring the bill suggested that persuading enough Democrats to support it would be challenging due to various factors, including the possibility of a shift in Congressional control in the upcoming November elections and the aforementioned ethical concerns. The White House would need to agree to substantial changes to the ethics language, as Democrats who might typically support the bill are unlikely to do so at this stage, according to this source.

A Senate staffer similarly remarked that a "legitimate" agreement would be necessary to secure Democratic votes for the bill.

There had been discussions about holding a vote to at least record lawmakers' positions on Clarity, as Semafor reported last month. This could influence how groups like Fairshake and other crypto political action committees allocate their resources in the final weeks of the election cycle. A source familiar with the situation attributed the failure to hold a vote to Democrats, claiming that a vote would have alienated the crypto sector and deterred campaign funding from them.

Conversely, another staffer indicated that the emergence of concerns from Republicans about the bill, alongside ongoing negotiations by Democrats like Alsobrooks and Ruben Gallego, suggests that blame cannot be solely assigned to one party.

Senator Thom Tillis told Politico that "the odds drop precipitously" regarding the bill's chances, citing the impending elections and the lengthy break as contributing factors.

Nevertheless, two individuals who spoke with CoinDesk maintained that the bill still has a viable path to passage, particularly since the August deadline was more of a target than a strict requirement for the crypto industry.

As has been the case, the bill's prospects will hinge on what negotiations the Senate can achieve in the next five weeks.

This Week

This week

We're taking a breather, maybe.

If you have thoughts or suggestions for next week’s discussion, or any feedback to share, feel free to email me at nik@coindesk.com or connect with me on Bluesky @nikhileshde.bsky.social.

You can also join the collective conversation on Telegram.

See you all next week!

Newsletters State of Crypto Latest Crypto News

Latest Research

Building the Zcash Machine: Tachyon and Quantum Readiness

Zcash’s Tachyon upgrade aims to scale shielded payments, improve quantum readiness, and test whether its funding, security, and governance can hold.

By CoinDesk ResearchJun 30, 2026Commissioned byGenZcash

Zcash’s Tachyon upgrade aims to scale shielded payments, improve quantum readiness, and test whether its funding, security, and governance can hold.

Why it matters:

Zcash’s Tachyon upgrade aims to scale shielded payments, improve quantum readiness, and test whether its funding, security, and governance can hold.

View Full Report More From Policy

Delay of Clarity Act: A Potential Silver Lining for Crypto

The crypto sector is expressing frustration and disappointment over the Senate's decision to forgo a procedural vote on the Clarity Act this month, although this may not be the worst scenario.

Building the Zcash Machine: Tachyon and Quantum Readiness

Building the Zcash Machine: Tachyon and Quantum Readiness

U.S. Senate opens first stage of crypto Clarity Act voting to give bill a chance next month

U.S. widens Iran crypto crackdown with sanctions on two exchanges

Bybit sues North Korea and Lazarus Group over $1.5 billion hack, secures asset freeze