Back to News
CryptoRegulationEthereumBitcoinEtfDefi

Crypto Stakeholders Urge SEC for Customized Regulations on New ETPs

Crypto stakeholders are pushing the SEC for tailored regulations on new ETPs, advocating for parity with ETFs to foster innovation and investor choices.

Mercation Admin
September 2, 2026 1 min read
Crypto Stakeholders Urge SEC for Customized Regulations on New ETPs

A coalition of crypto firms and consumer advocacy groups is urging the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to establish customized regulations for a new class of exchange-traded products (ETPs), which encompass cryptocurrencies, private assets, and event contracts. This initiative comes in response to the SEC's recent request for feedback on the adequacy of current regulations and whether adjustments are needed for emerging product types.

The Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) emphasized in their letter that non-ETF ETPs should receive regulatory advantages similar to those afforded to ETFs. They argue that applying these efficiencies would enhance innovation and provide more investment options. The CCI's stance is supported by prominent entities such as Andreessen Horowitz (A16z), Grayscale, and Charles Schwab, among others.

A16z specifically requested that the SEC maintain the current legal definition of an investment company and avoid broadly categorizing products that hold non-securities under the Investment Company Act of 1940. They highlighted the unique characteristics of crypto ETPs, which already meet exchange listing standards, and called for better synchronization between fund registration and exchange listing timelines.

While the SEC's approval of the first U.S. Bitcoin futures ETF in October 2021 and subsequent spot Bitcoin ETFs in January 2024 has paved the way for ETPs, the response from industry stakeholders reveals significant divisions. For example, Grayscale opposes new portfolio restrictions on digital assets, while Chainalysis advocates for clearer guidance on monitoring standards for blockchain-based ETFs.

Kalshi, a prediction market firm, argues that event contracts should qualify for registered funds, adhering to existing governance and investor protection standards. However, consumer advocacy group Public Citizen warns that introducing event-contract ETFs could mislead retail investors, who expect stable investment vehicles linked to productive economic activities.

As the SEC evaluates these proposals, it must determine whether to create a unified regulatory framework for ETPs or develop distinct rules tailored to their unique structures and associated risks.