Back to News
NewsRegulationFederal Reserve

Celsius Founder Alex Mashinsky Seeks to Overturn 12-Year Fraud Sentence

Alex Mashinsky, founder of Celsius, seeks to overturn his 12-year fraud sentence, claiming ineffective legal representation.

Mercation Admin
May 29, 2026 1 min read
Celsius Founder Alex Mashinsky Seeks to Overturn 12-Year Fraud Sentence

Alex Mashinsky Seeks to Overturn Prison Sentence

Alex Mashinsky, the founder of the collapsed cryptocurrency lending platform Celsius, has filed an appeal to the District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking to overturn his 12-year prison sentence.

In his handwritten motion, Mashinsky argues that his legal representation was ineffective, which he claims significantly impacted his case. He cites the principle of "fruit of a poisonous tree" as a key reason for his appeal.

Mashinsky pled guilty to commodities and securities fraud, admitting to actions that defrauded customers of $42 million. In his filing, he contends that his attorneys from Mukasey & Young LLP faced undisclosed financial difficulties that created a conflict of interest, undermining their ability to represent him effectively.

He highlights a specific conflict of interest involving the firm’s ties to Sam Bankman-Fried, the former CEO of FTX, suggesting that these connections influenced the strategic decisions made in his defense. According to Mashinsky, the firm’s financial troubles led to compromised legal strategies that ultimately affected the outcome of his case.

Following the suspension of withdrawals from Celsius, the company filed for bankruptcy, which led to Mashinsky's arrest a year later. Despite receiving a 12-year sentence, he expressed remorse in court, stating, "I know what I did was wrong, and I want to try to do whatever I can to make it right." Mashinsky is now attempting to have this sentence overturned.

In addition to his prison sentence, Mashinsky was barred from engaging in cryptocurrency activities as part of a $10 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, which stemmed from a broader $4.7 billion judgment against him, most of which has been suspended.