Back to News
CryptoBitcoin

Bitcoin Fork from BIP-110 Fails to Gain Traction After Two Blocks

A Bitcoin fork from BIP-110 stalled after mining only two blocks, lagging significantly behind the main network.

Mercation Admin
August 9, 2026 2 min read
Bitcoin Fork from BIP-110 Fails to Gain Traction After Two Blocks

Summary

  • A Bitcoin fork stemming from BIP-110 was created at block 961,632 but managed to mine only two blocks before stalling, significantly lagging behind the main network.
  • This fork inherited Bitcoin's difficulty adjustment but had minimal hashpower, with only about 2.53% of recent blocks supporting it, far below the 55% needed for activation.
  • Critics warn that BIP-110, which sought to limit non-financial data transactions, could set a concerning precedent for censorship within the network.

A contentious proposal within the Bitcoin community has led to a fork that quickly faltered, mining just two blocks in approximately eight hours before stalling. This event occurred in response to Bitcoin Improvement Proposal BIP-110, which aimed to prevent non-financial data from being included in transactions.

The split at block 961,632 saw nodes utilizing BIP-110 software reject blocks that did not align with its parameters, creating a significant gap as the main Bitcoin network continued its regular block production. A block mined by AntPool was accepted by the main network while a miner from Ocean pool initiated the minority chain by mining a block for BIP-110.

As time progressed, the new chain fell further behind, trailing by dozens of blocks due to a mining difficulty adjustment issue. The fork inherited Bitcoin's existing difficulty settings but only garnered support from about 2.53% of recent blocks, well below the necessary threshold for successful activation without a split. At its current mining rate, the fork would take nearly a year to adjust its difficulty settings, leading to block intervals of several hours compared to Bitcoin's ten-minute average.

Proponents of BIP-110 argue that it protects the network from spam and potential legal complications linked to non-financial data, while opponents believe it undermines Bitcoin's core principles of censorship resistance. Michael Saylor, a vocal critic, emphasized that the majority of Bitcoin’s hash power remained with the main network, stating, "approximately 99.85% of Bitcoin's hash power stayed with Bitcoin. The BIP-110 branch mined only two blocks and is already over 80 blocks behind."

Jameson Lopp, a prominent Bitcoin advocate, echoed Saylor’s sentiment, expressing that he would not welcome back supporters of BIP-110, citing their susceptibility to misinformation and harassment of Bitcoin defenders.

Holders of the fork's coins face additional complications, as transactions on both chains are identical, raising the risk of replay attacks. The signaling period for BIP-110 will close at block 963,647, a target the chain is unlikely to reach.